21 February 2009

Review

A common gripe from my non-jazz-listening friends is that they often want to listen to jazz, but they don't have the time to figure out the good from the bad or start learning about the historically important recordings. This is essentially a lame cop-out ("I've got tons of CDs, I can lend you five good ones to start off with," is my usual reply), but now jazz fans have an essential resource that could break down even the most passive jazz resistor. Take Five: A Weekly Jazz Sampler from NPR and Jazz24 presents a simple introduction to jazz for the novice by selecting five songs every week, and streaming them via podcast.

Take Five's podcasts offer a good variety of music to sample. On any given week, the program could take a look at a particular subgenre (like hard bop, soul jazz, or fusion), important recordings from individual instruments (like vibes or flute), or best-of compilations (like the best of Blue Note, 2008, or modern piano trios). The lists can get creative and unearth some recordings that even advanced listeners have yet to check out, like this list of jazz tunes from the Civil Rights Movement - I didn't know Grant Green had written a tune commemorating the completion of the 1965 Selma-to-Montgomery march.

So keep it in mind next time you run across a friend bemoaning the insurmountable barriers to loving jazz. They'll thank you later.

Subscribe via podcast feed or RSS feed.

13 February 2009

Links

Those hard bop posts took a long time, so I'm taking the weekend off. Enjoy the links, see you next week...
  • One of my favorite time-wasters is If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger, There'd Be a Whole Lot of Dead Copycats. They have plenty of photo collections for any taste, but two that potentially of interest to readers of this blog are The Art of Jazz and The Friends of Milt Hinton, featuring the photography of the great bassist. Bonus points for anyone who can guess the reference in the blog's title...
  • Nat Hentoff has begun writing for jazz.com. Here's his first contribution, on Nesuhi Ertegun and Joel Dorn.
  • Have you ever read any of Brad Mehldau's prose? He's quite a thoughtful writer, and many of his writings are posted on his website (you can also download his complete works on a pdf here).
  • Just in time for Valentine's Day, Night Lights will be looking at some husband-and-wife teams in jazz on tonight's show.
  • Since today is Friday the 13th, I wanted to post a video of Monk playing his tune of the same name (from his Prestige date with Sonny Rollins), but there is no video to be found on YouTube. Instead, here is a trio recording of Friday the 13th performed by Avram Fefer on saxophone, Michael Bisio on bass, and Igal Foni on drums.

10 February 2009

Hard Bop

Last week at Rifftides, journalist and blogger Doug Ramsey wrote a short post on the complicated nature of the term "hard bop." Pointing out the difficulties in hammering out a definition of hard bop, he quotes longtime record producer and jazz scholar Orrin Keepnews, who said,
So it is quite possible that there never really was a musical style that could properly be described a "hard bop."
This sparked an interesting debate in the comments section, and even warranted follow-up posts from Doug and others. The subject of hard bop is something I have spent much time considering. My undergraduate thesis at the University of Florida focused on the social politics of hard bop. Ramsey is correct to note that hard bop is a complicated genre. Unlike bebop or free jazz, it does not represent a progression of jazz, in which new elements were incorporated into the music while other elements were jettisoned completely. Rather, in the words of noted critic Martin Williams, hard bop was a regression, in which a number of musicians reduced jazz to its so-called "roots," namely, African American folk forms like the blues, with a bit of gospel and R&B thrown in the mix.

Of course, the major problem with the term hard bop is that it was invented by music critics* and rarely used by musicians themselves (such was the case with bebop for a long time as well; many musicians simply referred to it as modern jazz). However, this fact does not delegitimize the term. Though assigning genre labels to music can in effect create unnecessary boundaries around that music, it is nonetheless helpful in understanding both the the musical and social forces that contributed to the creation of individual musical statements and the evolution of jazz itself.

So I though I would indulge myself with a longish post on the subject of hard bop. For organizational purposes, I have broken up the piece into several subposts, Ethan Iverson-style. The posts that follow are largely derived from my UF thesis. If you would like to read a copy of the thesis itself, drop me a line (davidhill126[at]gmail[dot]com) and I would be happy to send you a copy. Your comments are as always welcome.


*In his liner notes to the 1957 Art Blakey album Hard Bop, Nat Hentoff writes that John Mehegan first used the phrase "hard bop" while writing for the New York Herald Tribune in the mid-1950s.



Table of Contents

The Musical Definition of Hard Bop
East Coast vs. West Coast Jazz: A False Dichotomy?
The Racial Politics of Hard Bop
Recommended Readings and Discography

The Musical Definition of Hard Bop

Let's begin with the most elementary definition of hard bop. Hard bop was an mid-1950s extension of bebop that emphasized roots of jazz (namely, the blues) while incorporating elements of R&B and gospel. That is the simple definition, but in reality, it is more complicated than that.

To really understand hard bop, you have to understand cool jazz. Cool jazz developed as a relatively slow-paced, well-structured, and subdued style of jazz, with a slightly narrow range of emotional expression. Whereas bebop (typified by the music of Charlie Parker, Bud Powell, and Dizzy Gillespie) was fast-paced and full of complex harmony, cool jazz was easy on the ears. The first cool jazz recordings were the Miles Davis Birth of the Cool sessions. Miles Davis wrote of the difference between Birth of the Cool and bebop:
Bird and Diz played this hip, real fast thing, and if you weren’t a fast listener, you couldn’t catch the humor or the feeling in their music.... But Birth of the Cool was different because you could hear everything and hum it also.
This was typical of cool jazz as a whole. After Birth of the Cool, other groups adopted the style initiated by Davis and his collaborator, Gil Evans. In addition to incorporating the subtle swing of Birth of the Cool, cool jazz witnessed a rise in experimentation and fusion with the European classical tradition. Gerry Mulligan and John Lewis utilized contrapuntal forms in their music. Dave Brubeck studied composition with the French composer Darius Milhaud and experimented with non-standard meter. These were not the first musicians to engage with the classical tradition (Charlie Parker, for instance, was fond of quoting The Rite of Spring in his solos), but they represented a new wave of experimentation of jazz which was colored with European flavor.

Typically, these Europhilic innovations came at the expense of the various African American cultural forms, such as the blues, which were at the forefront of earlier jazz. Cool jazz also often did not swing as hard as bebop or swing. The lightness of swing and detachment from the blues were major sources of criticism of cool jazz, out of which hard bop was conceived. In a 1986 interview, Art Blakey commented retrospectively that cool jazz was too stale for his taste, alluding to the communicative power he felt in the blues. He charged that the musicians of cool jazz lacked "fire," adding, "Music is supposed to wash away the dust of everyday life, not come in cool. You’re supposed to make [the audience] turn around, pat their feet. That’s what jazz is about." Though he is often credited as a creator of cool jazz, Miles Davis remembered in his autobiography that cool jazz had become unexciting to him by the mid-1950s. He wanted to "take the music back to the fire and improvisations of bebop" after cool jazz had come into vogue in the 1950s.

Hard bop was born in the mid-1950s. Two recordings signaled the birth of hard bop: Miles Davis' Walkin'and Horace Silver's Horace Silver and the Jazz Messengers, both recorded in 1954. The title track of Walkin' was called "the clarion call of the hard bop movement" by jazz critic Frank Kofsky. Written in the traditional 12-bar blues form, the tune featured trumpet playing from Davis heavily versed in the blues and a new approach to jazz piano from Silver, who favored blues voicings over the fugue-like countermelodies of cool jazz. As Davis put it in his autobiography, "I wanted to take the music forward into a more funky kind of blues." Horace Silver and the Jazz Messengers spawned a hard bop classic, Silver’s "The Preacher," highlighted by a gospel-like melody, Silver’s bluesy piano style, and a very strong rhythmic drive.

After these recordings met artistic and commercial success (Walkin’ contributed to Davis’ artistic and commercial resurgence in the middle of the decade while a single of "The Preacher" would sell 100,000 copies), other musicians adopted a similar style, and hard bop as a movement in jazz was born. It was easier to understand than bebop (which was almost universally panned outside of a few enthusiastic critics during the 1940s), but had a stronger rhythmic drive and wider range of emotional expression than cool jazz. Hard bop was funky, earthy, and intensely catchy.

In my mind, the quintessential recording of hard bop was Art Blakey's "Moanin'," written by pianist Bobby Timmons. The melody, laid over a standard 4/4 swing beat, featured call and response riffs between the piano and winds reminiscent of black churches. The tune also featured an incredibly bluesy solo by Lee Morgan, who himself was the archetypal hard bop trumpeter. If you were to construct a checklist of concepts necessary to define a hard bop tune, "Moanin'" would meet all the criteria on the list. The melody swings hard and utilizes blues voicings. The soloists (Morgan, tenor saxophonist Benny Golson, and Timmons) drift between blues riffs and intricate runs of sixteenth notes suggestive of Parker and Gillespie. The arrangement is also well-structured, with the call-and-response patterns and countermelodies explicitly written out for the winds and piano.



The verbal discourse of hard bop was also highly informed by African American culture. "Funky," "dirty," "the gutbucket," and "down-home" came to the forefront of jazz vernacular. Some notable song titles of the style include "Home Cookin'," "Dat Dere," "Dig Dis," and "Sister Sadie." Such descriptions and song titles reflected the African American identity of hard bop.

It is also important to note that hard bop is more accurately a variety of styles united under the term "hard bop," rather than a monolithic and unified style. Nat Adderley's tune "Fun," featured on Cannonball Adderley's Mercy, Mercy, Mercy, rarely gets into 4/4 swing, but it is undoubtedly a hard bop tune. Any of the selections from Charles Mingus' Blues and Roots utilized blues riffs in contrapuntal forms and group improvisation, but the album can still be considered hard bop. Critic David Rosenthal, in his expansive musical study of the genre, divides hard bop into four sub-genres between the poles of experimentally-driven jazz and music that resembles both jazz and R&B. Such a conceptual framework explains why the soul jazz of Ramsey Lewis and the modernist experiments of Mingus can be fit into the hard bop spectrum.

Hard bop was widely praised by a number of critics beginning in the mid-1950s, some of whom had grown tired of cool jazz. Jazz critic Martin Williams praised hard bop’s "return to the roots" of jazz in 1959, arguing that it "saved both the emotional heart of jazz and its very substance from a preciocity [sic], contrivance, and emptiness that certain tendencies in cool jazz might have led to."

Chronologically, hard bop's heyday lasted from roughly the mid-1950s through the early 1960s, but the style itself did not die. Mercy Mercy Mercy, recorded in 1966, is an oft-cited example of the style, while the 1980s recordings of Wynton Marsalis were also arguably hard bop. Certain record labels, most notably Blue Note Records, Prestige Records, and Riverside Records, have become associated with hard bop. While these labels released many hard bop albums, none had a monopoly on the genre, nor were any devoted exclusively to hard bop.

East Coast vs. West Coast Jazz: A False Dichotomy?

A big source of confusion surrounding the meaning of hard bop is its geographical relationship with cool jazz, or, as it was often called in the 1950s, West Coast jazz. Many critics placed geographical labels on cool jazz and hard bop which were not entirely accurate. Many of the luminaries of cool jazz, including Chet Baker and Dave Brubeck, were based in Los Angeles. Thus, the term "West Coast Jazz" was born. And since hard bop arose as a reaction to cool jazz, and since most of its practitioners, like Miles Davis, Horace Silver, and Art Blakey, were based in New York, some critics decided to refer to hard bop as "East Coast Jazz."

But as Ted Gioia showed in his book West Coast Jazz: Modern Jazz in California 1945-1960, the linkage between cool jazz and the West Coast was tenuous at best. While many stars of cool jazz were based out west, some, like Gerry Mulligan and Stan Getz, operated out of New York. Conversely, many black musicians who would play an important role in hard bop, including Charles Mingus and Art Farmer, originally started out on the West Coast. "West Coast Jazz" was a convenient geographical association for cool jazz, but in reality, it distorted more than it illuminated.

Similarly, another source of confusion when it comes to the definitions of cool jazz and hard bop is the association between a number of record labels, as mentioned at the end of the previous post. Some would argue that if an album was released by Blue Note, Riverside, or Prestige, then that album is by definition hard bop. Conversely, if an album came out on Fantasy Records, then that record is by definition cool jazz, according to this argument. Though Blue Note, Riverside, and Prestige released many hard bop records, and Fantasy released many cool jazz records, all of these labels were much more diverse than this argument indicates. Blue Note, after all, released a lot of great avant-garde records in the 1960s (Eric Dolphy's Out To Lunch and Ornette Coleman's Live at The Golden Circle come to mind), just to give one example of an exception. Defining a subgenre of jazz by which label it appeared on probably creates more confusion than clarification.

Stats